Australian Kin Classification by Harold W. Scheffler

By Harold W. Scheffler

This research goals to solve the century-old debate concerning the nature of Australian aboriginal societies and the comparison in their constructions with the constructions of different tribal and kinship-based societies. It starts off with a severe assessment and refutation of the claims that Australians are 'ignorant of actual paternity' and accordingly can't have structures of family class. Professor Scheffler then demonstrates that structures of family members category are a standard function of Australian languages and that, opposite to the speculation proposed through A. R. Radcliffe-Brown and others, edition within the ideas of interkin marriage doesn't account for edition in platforms of family class. This was once the 1st monographic therapy of the topic given that Radcliffe-Brown's vintage paintings, The Social association of the Australian Tribes, released in 1931, and is far extra finished and artificial in its assurance of the variety of edition in Australian structures of family class. It applies the techniques and strategies of structural semantic research to a vast variety of ethnographic and linguistic info, and demonstrates how they get to the bottom of one in all anthropology's oldest and such a lot difficult theoretical puzzles.

Show description

Read or Download Australian Kin Classification PDF

Best foreign language dictionaries & thesauruses books

Colloquial Russian 2: The Next Step in Language Learning

Colloquial Russian 2 is designed to assist these excited about self-study; based to provide you the chance to hear and browse plenty of glossy, daily Russian,

Brazilian Student Activities Manual for Ponto de Encontro: Portuguese as a World Language

There's a Brazilian model and ecu Portuguese model of the scholar actions guide. The association of the scholar actions guide follows that of the most textual content, delivering extra perform of every chapter’s vocabulary and grammatical buildings via sentence-building and final touch routines, fill-ins, and artwork- and realia-cued actions.

Additional info for Australian Kin Classification

Example text

These descrip- tive expressions demonstrate that Dieri kinship terms may be used in specific or in general (expanded) senses, that is, that the terms are polysemic. If they were monosemic or polysemous in the way claimed by Fison and Howitt and Spencer and Gillen, these relative product expressions could hardly serve, as clearly they are intended, to specify a particular type of kinsman (see also Scheffler 1977). Social categories So far the discussion has focused on the question of how the more inclusive genealogical categories designated by certain expressions are related to the less inclusive genealogical categories also designated by those expressions.

The Dyirbal lan- guage features the verb bulmbinyu •to be the male progenitor o f , and according to Dixon it "has clear reference to the particular act of copulation that induced a conception. •• Presumably Dixon finds no reasons to suppose that this expression was coined to signify a new concept introduced into the culture after Roth made his cursory observations. " It seems clear, however, that what we have here are not "two levels of belief" about the same thing, each accounting for the same fact or facts (conception per se), but instead two complementary theories, one about conception per se and the other about the instantiation of totemic beings in individual human beings.

37 CONCLUSION In this chapter I have shown that many Australian languages and cultures include systems of kin classification. Because the presence of such a system has to be demonstrated for each language and culture individually, I have not argued that systems of kin classification are a universal feature of Australian societies, although I think there are few if any reasons to suspect that they are not and many good reasons to suspect that they are. Be this as it may, although such systems have been reported for all parts of Australia, the ethnographers have not always provided adequate evidence in support of their claims, and there are many systems of kin classification reported in the literature for which the documentation is deficient in many ways and about which additional information probably cannot now be acquired.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.34 of 5 – based on 8 votes