By David M Moffitt
Students usually clarify Hebrews relative silence relating to Jesus resurrection through emphasizing the authors attract Yom Kippurs key momentsthe sacrificial slaughter and the excessive clergymen presentation of blood within the holy of holiesin his exact portrayal of Jesus demise and heavenly exaltation. The writers depiction of Jesus because the excessive priest whose blood effected final atonement seems to be modeled upon those moments. this kind of typology discourages discrete mirrored image on Jesus resurrection. Drawing on modern reviews of Jewish sacrifice (which word that blood represents lifestyles, no longer death), parallels in Jewish apocalyptic literature, and clean exegetical insights, this quantity demonstrates that Jesus embodied, resurrected lifestyles is essential for the high-priestly Christology and sacrificial soteriology constructed in Hebrews.
Read or Download Atonement and the Logic of Resurrection in the Epistle to the Hebrews PDF
Similar criticism & interpretation books
To learn the recent testomony is to satisfy the previous testomony at each flip. yet precisely how do outdated testomony texts relate to their New testomony references and allusions? additionally, what fruitful interpretive equipment do New testomony texts show? top biblical students Walter Kaiser, Darrel Bock and Peter Enns every one current their solutions to questions surrounding using the previous testomony within the New testomony.
In severe background of the textual content of the hot testomony, seventeenth century Oratorian Richard Simon (1638-1712), 'father' of recent biblical feedback, surveys the genuineness, accuracy, authority, and reliability of all then recognized resources of the hot testomony. He makes rigorous, aim, and professional use of a astonishing volume of fabric in relation to the text--Greek and Latin manuscripts, early types, quotations from the previous testomony within the New, from the Church Fathers and different commentators of all sessions.
Drawing at the old and often-forgotten assets of esoteric Christianity, Valentin Tomberg displays at the mysteries of humanity's covenant with God in heritage. the ability of those meditations is they replicate the author's own religious trip into the depths of God's country within―within the soul, inside own relationships, inside nature and the cosmos.
Additional resources for Atonement and the Logic of Resurrection in the Epistle to the Hebrews
Before one can escape from that realm, the issue of sin must be addressed. Moreover, the goal of one’s escape is not simply that of leaving the world behind, but that of entering into God’s presence. The traditional affirmation of Jesus’ resurrection has no role to play in this contextualized proclamation about the redemption Christ 80 81 82 83 84 Käsemann, Gottesvolk, 59, 84. , 86–7. , 112–3. , 104–5. , 144. 32 chapter one effected. Indeed, given his larger Hellenistic context, it is hardly accidental that the author pushed aside Jesus’ resurrection in favor of a greater emphasis on his exaltation.
Andererseits fehlt in Hebr jede Beziehung auf die Rechtfertigungslehre mit ihren besonderen Voraussetzungen und besonderen Folgerungen; die Heilswirkung des Todes Christi wird nicht durch seine Auferstehung, sondern durch seine Himmelfahrt gesichert” (129; cf. Mathias Rissi, Die Theologie des Hebräerbriefs: Ihre Verankerung in der Situation des Verfassers und seiner Leser [WUNT 41; Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1987], 61–81, esp. 80–1). 46 Windisch notes that the variant in 13:20 that reads ἐκ τῆς γῆς instead of ἐκ νεκρῶν “würde auch hier die Auffahrt ohne Grablegung und Auferstehung lehren,” though he seems unwilling to adopt the variant (Hebräerbrief, 121).
As the block quotation above indicates, the human body of Jesus does not play a meaningful role in the atonement. g. ”75 Following Harnack, Bertram thinks the earliest Christian proclamation of salvation emphasized the shedding of Jesus’ blood. Thus he claims, “Der Tod Jesu hat 73 Bertram refers here to the variant that reads ἐκ τῆς γῆς in 13:20 instead of ἐκ νεκρῶν. 74 75 Bertram, “Himmelfahrt,” 213–4. , 214. ”76 Jesus’ embodied suffering and death were only the means to procure the allimportant blood.